Which statement is NOT a reason for choosing Datorama in the Build vs. Buy conversation?

Choosing Datorama in the Build vs. Buy conversation is often driven by practical considerations related to resource allocation, maintenance, and efficiency. The reasons typically cited for selecting Datorama include its ease of use and minimal technical overhead.

The statement regarding Datorama being a company with a lot of amazing employees does not contribute to the rationale for its selection in the context of the Build vs. Buy discussion. While having talented employees is certainly a beneficial aspect of any company, it is not a decisive factor when assessing the platform's technical capabilities or operational efficiency. Instead, the focus in this context should be on aspects that directly impact the user experience, maintenance burden, and integration efforts.

By facilitating quick deployment without extensive engineering resources, eliminating upfront API development needs, and allowing users to spend less time managing data, Datorama offers compelling reasons that align with organizational priorities in a competitive landscape. These factors resonate more in the decision-making process compared to the general quality of the workforce at the company.